In the heart of British Columbia, Vancouver stands as a vibrant cultural and economic hub, renowned for its natural beauty and cosmopolitan charm. Yet, beneath its gleaming skyline and picturesque landscapes lies a pressing issue that has gripped the city and the nation for years: the housing affordability crisis. This crisis has transformed Vancouver into one of the most unaffordable cities in the world, a place where skyrocketing home prices have left many, especially young people, struggling to find a foothold.

In the complex and often unpredictable world of international trade, the recent actions by US President Donald Trump have sent shockwaves through the global economy. The imposition of what Trump dubbed "Liberation Day" tariffs on 2 April has sparked a cascade of reactions, from retaliatory measures by other nations to a palpable sense of unease among businesses and investors. Amidst this turmoil, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has stepped forward with a cautiously optimistic outlook, asserting that while trade tariff uncertainty is at unprecedented levels, a global recession is not imminent. This assertion, however, comes with a clear call to action for countries to fortify their economic foundations and navigate the stormy waters ahead with wisdom and resilience.

In the intricate dance of global trade, few companies find themselves as delicately poised as Apple. With China as its second-largest market and the epicenter of its manufacturing operations, Apple's supply chain has become a focal point of the ongoing trade tensions between the United States and China. This complex interplay of economics, politics, and technology raises a critical question: How can Apple navigate the precarious balance between its reliance on China's manufacturing prowess and the increasing pressure from the US to "bring jobs back home"?

President Donald Trump's aggressive tariff campaign continues to reshape the global trade landscape, moving from broad "reciprocal" tariffs to more sector-specific measures. This approach leverages Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, which allows the president to impose tariffs to protect or bolster domestic industries if potential national security threats are identified. Once a rarely used provision, Section 232 has become a cornerstone of Trump's trade strategy, with investigations launched into various sectors, including copper, lumber, pharmaceuticals, and semiconductors.

In the ever-volatile world of global trade, the Trump administration’s recent moves have sent shockwaves through financial markets. On Monday, US stocks experienced a surge, driven by the administration’s decision to exempt tariffs on smartphones, computers, and various electronics imported from China. This temporary reprieve provided a much-needed boost to investor confidence, but the underlying uncertainty remains a significant concern for traders and businesses alike.

In the ongoing saga of the US-China trade war, a new front has opened in the courtroom. A group of US businesses, represented by the Liberty Justice Center, has filed a lawsuit arguing that President Donald Trump’s tariffs are illegal under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). This legal challenge is the latest in a series of attempts to curb the president’s expansive use of tariffs, which have roiled global markets and strained US-China relations. The suit, filed in the US Court of International Trade, highlights the constitutional and legal questions surrounding the president’s authority to impose tariffs and the broader implications for the separation of powers.

In the intricate web of global trade, the imposition of tariffs often sets off a chain reaction that can have far-reaching consequences. The recent tit-for-tat tariffs between the United States and China have not only strained diplomatic relations but also disrupted supply chains and created significant challenges for businesses on both sides of the Pacific. One particularly poignant example of this disruption is the return of a Boeing 737 MAX jet, intended for a Chinese airline, to the United States due to the escalating trade tensions.

In the complex world of international trade, tariffs are often seen as temporary measures to protect domestic industries. However, the history of the "chicken tax" serves as a stark reminder of how tariffs can have lasting effects on global markets and domestic economies. This import tax, originally imposed in 1963, remains in effect today, illustrating the enduring impact of trade policies and the challenges of reversing them.

Small businesses have long been celebrated as the backbone of the US economy, embodying the entrepreneurial spirit and innovation that drive economic growth. For many, the American dream is realized through the hard work and dedication poured into these homegrown enterprises. However, the recent surge in tariffs imposed by the Trump administration has turned the tide against these very businesses, threatening their survival and casting a shadow over the future of American entrepreneurship.

In the intricate world of global logistics, even minor regulatory changes can have significant ripple effects. DHL Express, a division of Germany’s Deutsche Post, recently announced a temporary suspension of global business-to-consumer shipments valued over $800 to individuals in the United States, effective from April 21. This decision comes as a direct response to new US customs regulations that have extended clearance times and increased administrative burdens. While the suspension is intended to be temporary, it highlights the complexities and challenges that shipping companies face in adapting to shifting regulatory environments.

In the ever-evolving landscape of the American financial sector, a significant shift is on the horizon. Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) has received regulatory approval from the Federal Reserve’s Board of Governors and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to acquire and merge with Discover Financial Services (DFS). This landmark deal, first announced over a year ago, is poised to reshape the competitive dynamics of the US credit card industry and potentially alter the financial landscape for millions of consumers.

In the complex tapestry of global economics, the United States has long been a dominant force, with its robust economy and influential role in international trade. However, the advent of President Donald Trump's administration has introduced a new layer of complexity and uncertainty. Trump has repeatedly emphasized the return of manufacturing to the United States, celebrating companies that pledge to invest heavily in domestic production. Yet, beneath the surface of these announcements lies a more intricate and precarious reality.

In the ongoing saga of the US-China trade conflict, the United States has unveiled yet another measure aimed at reshaping the global economic landscape. This time, the focus is on the maritime industry, with the US government announcing plans to impose new port fees on Chinese ships docking in American ports. The stated goal is to revive American shipbuilding and counter China’s dominance in the industry. However, this move is likely to further escalate trade tensions and could have far-reaching consequences for both nations and the global economy.

In the complex and often contentious relationship between the White House and the Federal Reserve, President Donald Trump has made no secret of his frustration with current Fed Chair Jerome Powell. Trump’s recent comments, suggesting that Powell’s “termination can’t come fast enough,” highlight the president’s desire for a more compliant central banker. While many experts argue that the president lacks the legal authority to remove Powell due to policy differences, Trump has shown a willingness to challenge norms and precedents. This raises the question: Who might lead the US central bank under Trump, either at the end of Powell’s term in May 2026 or potentially sooner?

In the digital age, where convenience and connectivity reign supreme, the dark side of technology often rears its head in the form of scams and frauds. One such insidious scheme that has gained alarming traction in recent times is the unpaid toll scam. If you’ve received a text claiming you owe money for unpaid highway tolls, you’re not alone—and you’re not necessarily in the wrong for being wary. Last year alone, over 60,000 complaints were made to the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center regarding this very scam. This widespread issue underscores the need for vigilance and education to protect ourselves and our finances.

In the ever-changing landscape of the global economy, the current climate is one of heightened uncertainty and anxiety for American investors. Escalating trade tensions, gloomy economic forecasts, and the looming threat of a recession have cast a shadow over investment portfolios, leaving many feeling uneasy about the future. According to a recent Reuters poll, the probability of a US recession within the next 12 months has surged to 45%, up from 25% just last month — the highest since December 2023. President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs, which have ignited a global trade war, have further fueled concerns about inflation, slower growth, and potential layoffs. In such a volatile environment, investors are faced with the daunting task of safeguarding their financial futures.

In the intricate tapestry of global finance, the US stock market often serves as a barometer of economic health, investor sentiment, and geopolitical tensions. Thursday’s trading session was a quintessential example of this, as stocks oscillated between gains and losses in response to a flurry of statements from President Donald Trump, ranging from threats to fire Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell to assurances of imminent trade deals with Europe and China. This day of mixed signals and shifting sentiments encapsulates the current state of financial markets, where uncertainty reigns supreme and every presidential tweet or press conference can send ripples through the economy.

In the high-stakes game of economic policy, the relationship between the President of the United States and the Federal Reserve is often a delicate balance of power. However, recent events have brought this relationship to the forefront of public scrutiny, as President Donald Trump has escalated his criticism of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, calling for his “termination” over perceived failures in monetary policy. This clash of wills between the executive branch and the central bank is not just a matter of political posturing; it is a critical test of the Fed’s independence and the broader implications for the US economy.

In the intricate dance of global trade, tariffs have emerged as a powerful and disruptive force, casting long shadows over industries and consumers alike. The automotive sector, a cornerstone of the American economy, finds itself at the eye of this tariff storm, with Ford’s recent warning to its dealers serving as a stark reminder of the far-reaching consequences of these import taxes.

Spring, often heralded as the season of renewal and growth, is also a time when the housing market typically springs to life. Homebuyers, armed with dreams of white picket fences and freshly painted interiors, flock to the market in search of their perfect abode. However, this year’s spring homebuying season is unfolding against a backdrop of economic turbulence that threatens to cast a shadow over the usual optimism.